Re: Postgresql + containerization possible use case

From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgresql + containerization possible use case
Date: 2021-12-13 08:17:00
Message-ID: d7eec1e8-9ffc-345c-5750-aaf007ba6859@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Michael, Adrian

On 10/12/21 11:28 μ.μ., Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 12/10/21 12:06, Michael Lewis wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021, 2:24 AM Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com <mailto:achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi
>>     we are running some 140 remote servers (in the 7 seas via satellite
>>     connections)
>>
>>
>> How are they used? What is in Postgres? Should that all have the exact same read only data at all times?
>>
>
> A previous explanation from Achilleas Mantzios , not sure if this is still exactly how it works:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3124961.tmAbAIay6W%40smadev.internal.net
Thank you Adrian, the situation is the similar with the one you posted above (in 2012), albeit sizes/number of remote servers has increased.

In order to respond to Michael,
Remote pgsql servers are masters. A large majority of tables is read-only (by software, not enforced by other means), but those servers they have their very important write functions as well. And the
data are individual for any of those 100+ servers. There are no two identical DBs in the whole topology. Every server has its own data specific for this vessel.

>
>
>

--
Achilleas Mantzios
DBA, Analyst, IT Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Achilleas Mantzios 2021-12-13 08:29:10 Re: Postgresql + containerization possible use case
Previous Message Achilleas Mantzios 2021-12-13 08:09:59 Re: Postgresql + containerization possible use case