From: | "Anton Belyaev" <anton(dot)belyaev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Mark Cave-Ayland" <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)siriusit(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: R-tree, order by, limit |
Date: | 2008-09-22 10:18:08 |
Message-ID: | d7e834b0809220318v7c06cc6bq1e48de77525dfee@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2008/9/22 Mark Cave-Ayland <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)siriusit(dot)co(dot)uk>:
>>> I am implementing a map application. There are towns with altitude,
>>> longitude and population.
>>> One of the tasks is to be able to query N biggest (by population)
>>> towns within a rectangle.
> Have you considered using PostGIS? (http://postgis.refractions.net) It
> implements the OGC SFS for geometries and is compatible with a large number
> of open source viewers/tools such as Mapserver, Geoserver, QGIS, OGR etc...
Mark, thanks for the suggestion.
I examined PostGIS some time ago. It is too complex for my simple task
and it gives no advantages for me:
For spatial indexing it uses the same GiST-based R-tree.
And PostGIS does not offer that "population" or "priority" queries I need.
Anton.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Volkan YAZICI | 2008-09-22 10:30:01 | Re: R-tree, order by, limit |
Previous Message | Anton Belyaev | 2008-09-22 10:14:28 | Re: R-tree, order by, limit |