From: | "Dmitry Koterov" <dmitry(at)koterov(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Creation of a read-only role. |
Date: | 2007-03-16 22:47:11 |
Message-ID: | d7df81620703161547n1cabcca6i9f78060767cfa5fd@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello.
When we start using of any replication system (e.g. Slony) we need to create
a "read-only" role for access the database. This role must be able to read
anything, but should NOT be able to INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE for all
database objects.
Overall, we need 3 roles:
1. Administrator: can do anything with a database (by default this user is
already exists - "postgres").
2. Read-only: can only read. Runs on all slave nodes.
3. Read-write: can write, but cannot change the database schema. Runs on
master node only.
Is any way to easily create and maintain these standard roles?
Now I have written a stored procedure which iterates over the pg_catalog and
runs a lot of REVOKE & GRANT commands, but it seems to be not an universal
solution, because:
1. I have to re-run this procedure after I change the database schema. (Very
bad item! Can we avoid it?)
2. It looks like a "broot-force" method, and nothing said about it in the
Slony documentation (strange).
3. In MySQL (e.g.) there is a one-command way to create these three roles.
Again, these 3 roles seems to be a de-facto standard for replication
systems, but I found nothing about this question in the Google.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Eric | 2007-03-16 23:35:01 | cannot get build (initdb) to work after trying for a week |
Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2007-03-16 21:13:50 | Re: Lifecycle of PostgreSQL releases |