Re: Can we simplify win32 threading code

From: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can we simplify win32 threading code
Date: 2005-05-28 03:42:28
Message-ID: d78pf0$9u8$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


""Magnus Hagander"" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes
>
> It may not be necessary at all. But what I meant is I don't know what
> the default permissinos ar eon a shared mem/event object in the global
> namespace. On the naemd pipe it's "creator/owner full" (so the postgres
> account itself can issue kills), "administrators full" (so anybody who
> is admin on the box can) and "system full" (so the local system can
> issue them). If this is not the default on the other class of objects,
> we'll need to set specific permissions.
>

Ok, I will come up with a patch per discussion. One more thing, any tips to
test the PG win32 signal part?

Regards,
Qingqing

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-05-28 04:08:49 Re: [HACKERS] patches for items from TODO list
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-05-28 03:39:14 Re: overlaps() does not work as expected?