Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jesse Zhang <sbjesse(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Date: 2023-04-23 15:04:33
Message-ID: d785d648-c6e8-e273-c947-209a3ceeceb2@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2023-04-22 Sa 15:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 2023-04-22 Sa 11:37, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> * I see that there's now a 20230309 release, should we consider that
>>> instead?
>> A test I just ran gave identical results to those from 20221112
> Cool, let's use perltidy 20230309 then.
>
>

OK, so when would we do this? The change to 20230309 + valign changes is
fairly large:

188 files changed, 3657 insertions(+), 3395 deletions(-)

Maybe right before we fork the tree?

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-04-23 15:08:42 Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-04-23 14:52:27 Re: xmlserialize bug - extra empty row at the end