Re: SQL/JSON revisited

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, e(dot)indrupskaya(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON revisited
Date: 2023-04-04 20:05:47
Message-ID: d77e1d2b-e86b-553d-82b1-36191d6abb8d@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2023-04-04 Tu 08:36, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Surely this can be made cleaner.
>
> By the way -- that comment about clauses being non-standard, can you
> spot exactly *which* clauses that comment applies to?
>

Sadly, I don't think we're going to be able to make further progress
before feature freeze. Thanks to Alvaro for advancing us a way down the
field. I hope we can get the remainder committed in the July CF.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Luzanov 2023-04-04 20:35:13 Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2023-04-04 20:04:52 Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often