Re: Can we simplify win32 threading code

From: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Can we simplify win32 threading code
Date: 2005-05-27 03:22:10
Message-ID: d763su$l07$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


""Magnus Hagander"" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes
> > I assume that this will not break the use of pg_ctl to
> > deliver pseudo-signals. That would be a show-stopper.
>
> It shouldn't, but there is one concern: it has to be created in the
> global namespace. On older windows there is no different, but on modern
> windows with terminal services in it it does. It might require some
> permissions hackings - I don't know what the default permissinos are on
> these things. But I *think* it should work fine.
>

Yes, the mutex/event stuff should be in the global namespace. What do you
mean the permission hacks?

Regards,
Qingqing

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-05-27 03:27:15 unsafe use of hash_search(... HASH_ENTER ...)
Previous Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-05-27 03:10:26 Re: Can we simplify win32 threading code