From: | "Roberto Scattini" <roberto(dot)scattini(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Erik Jones" <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_xlog and standby |
Date: | 2008-01-23 20:18:42 |
Message-ID: | d70926850801231218y7954933by69890cf4ddb98351@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Jan 23, 2008 2:28 PM, Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> wrote:
>
> You don't. The main server should not be keeping archived WAL files
> directly in pg_xlog/. As it queues WAL files to be archived it puts
> them in pg_xlog/archive_status/ with file names suffixed with .ready,
> once they are archived that suffix changes to .done after which, at
> some point (I'm not sure how long/many) they are removed.
>
mmmmmmmm, ok. the problem that im having is that i have A LOT of
archive files on pg_xlog dir, and thats because the archive_command
keeps failing (the standby server had filled his disk with archives
received but not proccesed), so now, i dont know how i can remove
those files and start again...
> Now, if you took your standby server offline, but didn't disable your
> archive_command then you've basically been accumulating WALs with
> the .ready prefix in the archive_status directory that, if you're
> going to start from scratch with your standby, you can safely
> delete. Just make sure you have a couple of WAL files successfully
> archived (suffix has changed to .done in the archive_status dir and
> you've verified that they've reached whatever directory your standby
> expects them to be in) before call pg_start_backup() and starting
> your new base backup.
>
> IMO, the most important point to be had here is DO NOT delete WALs
> that sit directly under pg_xlog/. Mistakes with the rest can be
> worked with, you could run into serious problems with your primary
> when deleting WALs directly under pg_xlog/.
>
yeah, i agree. but now i have aprox 40GB of archive files in pg_xlog
dir in the production server. :S
> Also, do you know why your standby stopped recovering? I'd say you
> should make sure you know why and how, otherwise you run the risk of
> the same thing happening again.
i dont know exactly, but it is very possible that it could be an
unfinished server re-config.
>
> Erik Jones
thanks for your help!
--
Roberto Scattini
___ _
))_) __ )L __
((__)(('(( ((_)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Hart | 2008-01-23 20:19:47 | Re: Best practices for protect applications agains Sql injection. |
Previous Message | Charles Simard | 2008-01-23 20:08:09 | Re: Count |