From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export: difference in statistics dumped |
Date: | 2025-03-04 00:55:46 |
Message-ID: | d6e08fde8cb173b34a96c7d2bc9985aa657ce51f.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 22:04 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> But while we have hold of reltuples wasting a chance to
> update it in pg_class does not look right to me.
To me, autovacuum=off is a pretty clear signal that the user doesn't
want this kind of side-effect to happen. Am I missing something?
> I think the solution should be on the pg_dump/restore side and not on
> the server side.
What solution are you suggesting? The only one that comes to mind is
moving everything to SECTION_POST_DATA, which is possible, but it seems
like a big design change to satisfy a small detail.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-03-04 00:56:55 | Re: Add Pipelining support in psql |
Previous Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2025-03-04 00:42:35 | Re: New commitfest app release on March 4th |