Re: MinGW compiler warnings in ecpg tests

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MinGW compiler warnings in ecpg tests
Date: 2019-10-29 08:40:48
Message-ID: d6d249c4-517c-ff99-5935-891960af9ebd@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-10-26 10:40, Michael Meskes wrote:
>> These files don't use our printf replacement or the c.h porting
>> layer,
>> so unless we want to start doing that, I propose the attached patch
>> to
>> determine the appropriate format conversion the hard way.
>
> I don't think such porting efforts are worth it for a single test case,
> or in other words, if you ask me go ahead with your patch.

committed

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2019-10-29 08:54:47 Re: TRACE_SORT defined by default
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-10-29 08:28:55 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum