From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christoph Berg <christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reproducible builds: genbki.pl and Gen_fmgrtab.pl |
Date: | 2017-12-21 13:45:18 |
Message-ID: | d68d254a-6f97-a8c2-4656-ab8886fe2c38@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/21/2017 08:27 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Looks reasonable. Regarding the change to TestLib.pm, we should make
>> sure that the tests have unique names. There is a small amount of
>> duplication currently:
>>
>> ./src/bin/pg_dump/t/001_basic.pl
>> ./src/bin/pg_rewind/t/001_basic.pl
>> ./src/test/modules/commit_ts/t/001_base.pl
>> ./src/test/modules/test_pg_dump/t/001_base.pl
> Why does the uniqueness of application_name set in the TAP test suite
> matter? Each instance of Postgres is self-contained into its own Unix
> domain path and port.
I've found it annoying in the past. Probably now that the buildfarm
reports each test series separately it matters less. Previously we
reported many of the TAP tests together.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2017-12-21 13:46:12 | Re: Postgres with pthread |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2017-12-21 13:32:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |