From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres perl module namespace |
Date: | 2021-08-10 15:02:13 |
Message-ID: | d673844a-e670-36ff-d2fe-c1b9d579e9bd@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/10/21 10:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I will undertake to do the work, once we get the bike-shedding part done.
>> I'll kick that off by suggesting we move all of these to the namespace
>> PgTest, and rename TestLib to Utils, so instead of
>> use TestLib;
>> use PostgresNode;
>> you would say
>> use PgTest::Utils;
>> use PgTest::PostgresNode;
> Using both "Pg" and "Postgres" seems a bit inconsistent.
> Maybe "PgTest::PgNode"?
>
> More generally, I've never thought that "Node" was a great name
> here; it's a very vague term. While we're renaming, maybe we
> could change it to "PgTest::PgCluster" or the like?
>
>
I can live with that. I guess to be consistent we would also rename
PostgresVersion to PgVersion
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2021-08-10 15:13:49 | Quirk of pg_temp schemas ... |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2021-08-10 14:57:19 | Re: Add option --drop-cascade for pg_dump/restore |