From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created |
Date: | 2017-05-17 12:04:04 |
Message-ID: | d57bf74c-4928-dc07-697a-1572487e83f9@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 05/16/2017 10:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 5/16/17 18:14, pgsql(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote:
>>> Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created.
>> Was this change in naming pattern intentional?
> Yes, it was. Andrew Dunstan suggested[1] during the
> two-part-version-number discussion that we should start including a "_"
> after REL in tag and branch names for v10 and later, so that those names
> would sort correctly compared to the tag/branch names for earlier branches
> (at least when using C locale). I believe his main concern was some logic
> in the buildfarm, but it seems like a good idea in general.
>
> When we get to v100, we'll need some other hack to make it work ...
> but I plan to be safely dead by then.
>
Me too. Since posterity will be deprived of both of us let's note that
the same hack will work, we'll just need two underscores.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-05-17 12:41:42 | Re: pgsql: Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-05-17 02:57:56 | pgsql: Check relkind of tables in CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-05-17 12:41:42 | Re: pgsql: Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created |
Previous Message | Rushabh Lathia | 2017-05-17 11:59:08 | Re: UPDATE of partition key |