From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Error-safe user functions |
Date: | 2022-12-26 13:59:08 |
Message-ID: | d56179c3-86aa-dce1-7013-cb2473f0ace4@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-12-25 Su 12:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 1:31 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> The reg* functions probably need a unified plan as to how far
>>> down we want to push non-error behavior.
>> I would be in favor of an aggressive approach.
> Here's a proposed patch for converting regprocin and friends
> to soft error reporting. I'll say at the outset that it's an
> engineering compromise, and it may be worth going further in
> future. But I doubt it's worth doing more than this for v16,
> because the next steps would be pretty invasive.
It's a judgement call, but I'm not too fussed about stopping here for
v16. I see the reg* items as probably the lowest priority to fix.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2022-12-26 14:05:24 | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-12-26 13:29:44 | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |