Re: Connections - Postgres 9.2

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Connections - Postgres 9.2
Date: 2016-05-16 21:25:33
Message-ID: d55cc18a-733d-cc1c-c7c0-28f4a55bd253@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/16/2016 2:11 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>> Yes a connection consumes resources.
>>
>> an idle connection consumes some memory, a process context, and a
>> network socket. its not using CPU or disk IO.
>
> True, but the existence of poolers says that can be an issue.

I note that MRTG style graph showed max 16, average 5 idle
connections. thats a rather small number to be concerned with. if it
was 100s, then I'd be worrying about it.

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2016-05-16 21:48:34 Re: Connections - Postgres 9.2
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2016-05-16 21:11:40 Re: Connections - Postgres 9.2