Re: Building PostgreSQL 9.6devel sources with Microsoft Visual C++ 2015?

From: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Building PostgreSQL 9.6devel sources with Microsoft Visual C++ 2015?
Date: 2016-01-22 07:10:28
Message-ID: d5570d5a-6be8-4d3b-951a-428e0f03389e@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Michael Paquier wrote:
> How long do you think it would take for MS 1820 to be fixed and out?
Maybe never.

> I
> wouldn't personally mind telling to people trying to compile with 1800
> that we cannot support it because it is buggy. That's one less wart to
> have forever in the code.
For the user, this is a bad response. In addition, many of the new features
msvc, due to which the user must use it.
Also, I think the current code looks like a hack. It's okay if we for some
time to add one more hack. But as I wrote above, I will try to find a
better solution.
While I was not going to back down: CMake+MSVC2015

Thanks.

--
Yury Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2016-01-22 07:54:25 Re: long transfer time for binary data
Previous Message Rajeev Bhatta 2016-01-22 07:00:16 Re: Let's Do the CoC Right