Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net" <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers)
Date: 2021-10-29 22:56:50
Message-ID: d532e16f0d5e57a6a9fee63e0b4b4bf4510c2eeb.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 16:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> But the thing that defines a tenant need not be a role. It can be
> some
> other kind of object. Suppose we invent a CREATE TENANT command.

Would it be a recursive concept? Could a tenant create a sub-tenant?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-10-29 23:44:08 Re: Feature request for adoptive indexes
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-10-29 20:45:33 Re: Improving psql's \password command