Re: Improve TAP tests of pg_upgrade for cross-version tests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve TAP tests of pg_upgrade for cross-version tests
Date: 2022-06-12 14:14:35
Message-ID: d5016305-62a0-afda-605c-3add863d0919@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2022-06-09 Th 03:49, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:35:57AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 03:03:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> (Adding Andrew Dunstan in CC.)
>>>
>>> I have been toying with $subject, trying to improve the ways to test
>>> pg_upgrade across different major versions as perl makes that easier.
>>> The buildfarm does three things to allow such tests to work (see
>>> TestUpgradeXversion.pm):
> Rebased to cope with the recent changes in this area.

I tried in fb16d2c658 to avoid littering the mainline code with
version-specific tests, and put that in the methods in the subclasses
that override the mainline functions.

I'll try to rework this along those lines.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-06-12 14:19:23 Re: Subscription tests vs log_error_verbosity
Previous Message Jim Popovitch 2022-06-12 14:05:59 connection failures on forked processes