Re: Is this a bug ?

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is this a bug ?
Date: 2019-10-23 16:27:12
Message-ID: d4f9ad09-0c8e-ced6-792d-1ffcff00e569@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/23/19 11:20 AM, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 17:09, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> As much as I hate to say it, MSFT was right to ignore this bug in the standard.
> Standards are standards for a reason. It is almost never correct to
> deliberately ignore them. If you don't like them, then revise the
> standard.
>
> Historically Microsoft ignored standards either because they
> misunderstood them or because they wanted to lock in their customers,
> not for any reasons of altruism.
>
> For what it's worth, I can see a value to having
>
> SELECT 'this is quite a long string'
> 'which I've joined together '
> 'across multiple lines';
>
> although the advantage of it vs using a concat operator is slim.

There is no advantage to using it vs using a concat operator, and all
disadvantage.

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoff Winkless 2019-10-23 16:27:51 Re: Is this a bug ?
Previous Message Geoff Winkless 2019-10-23 16:20:07 Re: Is this a bug ?