| From: | Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is this a bug ? |
| Date: | 2019-10-23 16:27:12 |
| Message-ID: | d4f9ad09-0c8e-ced6-792d-1ffcff00e569@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 10/23/19 11:20 AM, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 17:09, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> As much as I hate to say it, MSFT was right to ignore this bug in the standard.
> Standards are standards for a reason. It is almost never correct to
> deliberately ignore them. If you don't like them, then revise the
> standard.
>
> Historically Microsoft ignored standards either because they
> misunderstood them or because they wanted to lock in their customers,
> not for any reasons of altruism.
>
> For what it's worth, I can see a value to having
>
> SELECT 'this is quite a long string'
> 'which I've joined together '
> 'across multiple lines';
>
> although the advantage of it vs using a concat operator is slim.
There is no advantage to using it vs using a concat operator, and all
disadvantage.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Geoff Winkless | 2019-10-23 16:27:51 | Re: Is this a bug ? |
| Previous Message | Geoff Winkless | 2019-10-23 16:20:07 | Re: Is this a bug ? |