Re: Lisp as a procedural language?

From what I remember with tinkering with Lisp a while back, SBCL and CMUCL
are the big free implementations. I remember something about GCL being
non-standard. Either of those should make lisp hackers happy.

2008/10/18 M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb(at)cesmail(dot)net>

> Someone at the PostgreSQL West conference last weekend expressed an
> interest in a Lisp procedural language. The only two Lisp environments
> I've found so far that aren't GPL are Steel Bank Common Lisp (MIT,
> http://sbcl.sourceforge.net) and XLispStat (BSD,
> http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~luke/xls/xlsinfo/xlsinfo.html<http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/%7Eluke/xls/xlsinfo/xlsinfo.html>).
> SBCL is a
> very active project, but I'm not sure about XLispStat.
> --
> M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
> ruby-perspectives.blogspot.com
>
> "A mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems." --
> Alfréd Rényi via Paul Erdős
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>