Re: errbacktrace

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: errbacktrace
Date: 2019-08-12 17:06:29
Message-ID: d4e057c3-860e-9f62-3d25-442369ae784b@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-08-12 13:19, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> If I understand well, backtrace is displayed only when edata->funcname
> is same like backtrace_function GUC. Isn't it too strong limit?
>
> For example, I want to see backtrace for all PANIC level errors on
> production, and I would not to limit the source function?

We can add additional ways to invoke this once we have the basic
functionality in.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2019-08-12 17:08:30 Re: errbacktrace
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-08-12 17:05:08 Re: Add "password_protocol" connection parameter to libpq