From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: errbacktrace |
Date: | 2019-08-12 17:06:29 |
Message-ID: | d4e057c3-860e-9f62-3d25-442369ae784b@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-08-12 13:19, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> If I understand well, backtrace is displayed only when edata->funcname
> is same like backtrace_function GUC. Isn't it too strong limit?
>
> For example, I want to see backtrace for all PANIC level errors on
> production, and I would not to limit the source function?
We can add additional ways to invoke this once we have the basic
functionality in.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-08-12 17:08:30 | Re: errbacktrace |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-08-12 17:05:08 | Re: Add "password_protocol" connection parameter to libpq |