| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Can we still dump version 7? |
| Date: | 2022-05-31 14:57:51 |
| Message-ID: | d4a59efe-8e92-a9ec-d14e-3f7a730fdb31@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 5/31/22 10:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com> writes:
>> I guess this statement is not true anymore?
>> "Current releases of the dump programs can read data from any server version back to 7.0."
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/upgrading.html
>
> Ugh, missed that, thanks for spotting it.
>
> I wonder whether we should update this or just remove it --- it's
> clearly something that's likely to get missed again.
While burdensome, +1 for updating. We don't want users to get caught by
surprise if pg_dumpall does not work on an old version when trying to
update to a newer version.
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jian he | 2022-05-31 15:21:55 | Re: CREATE EXTENSION not adding extension on second SCHEMA |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-05-31 14:55:44 | Re: Can we still dump version 7? |