Re: Binary or compiled version?

From: "Ben Trewern" <ben(dot)trewern(at)_nospam_mowlem(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Binary or compiled version?
Date: 2005-04-20 23:25:54
Message-ID: d46o8u$2d08$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I haven't had any joy trying to install the Redhat RPMs on mandrake 10.1.
It might be me but I did take some time trying. I also tried using the
SRPMs and building my own but that didn't work either.

Since then I've compiled my version and it works great. The only thing I
needed to do was mess around with the startup scripts a bit.

Regards,

Ben
"Jaqui Greenlees" <jaqui(at)telus(dot)net> wrote in message
news:42666E58(dot)7030308(at)telus(dot)net(dot)(dot)(dot)
> Alejandro D. Burne wrote:
>> Hi, I'm installing 8.0.2 on Mandrake and I saw binarys rpms only for RH.
>> Can someone tell me if is better install a rpm version or compile from
>> source in this case?
>>
>> Thanks, Alejandro
>>
>
> the rpm should work fine, even though it's rh.
> if not, rpmdrake ( urpmi ) will remove 8.0.2 so building from sources with
> clean system will be possible.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John DeSoi 2005-04-20 23:38:32 Re: CURRENT_TIMESTAMP vs actual time
Previous Message Christopher J. Bottaro 2005-04-20 22:15:46 CURRENT_TIMESTAMP vs actual time