On 23.06.2016 19:37, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Alex Ignatov
> <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru <mailto:a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>>wrote:
>
>
> On 23.06.2016 16:30, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:41:26AM +0000, amul sul wrote:
>
> On Monday, 20 June 2016 8:53 PM, Alex Ignatov
> <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
> <mailto:a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>> wrote:
>
>
> On 13.06.2016 18:52, amul sul wrote:
>
> And it wont stop on some simple whitespace. By using
> to_timestamp you
> can get any output results by providing illegal input
> parameters values:
> postgres=# SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP('2016-06-13 99
> <tel:2016-06-13%2099>:99:99', 'YYYYMMDD
> HH24:MI:SS');
> to_timestamp
> ------------------------
> 2016-01-06 14:40:39+03
>
> (1 row)
>
> We do consume extra space from input string, but not if it
> is in format string, see below:
>
> postgres=# SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP('2016-06-13 15:43:36',
> 'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS');
> to_timestamp
> ------------------------
> 2016-06-13 15:43:36-07
> (1 row)
>
> We should have same treatment for format string too.
>
> Thoughts? Comments?
>
> Well, the user specifies the format string, while the input
> string comes
> from the data, so I don't see having them behave the same as
> necessary.
>
>
> To be honest they not just behave differently. to_timestamp is
> just incorrectly handles input data and nothing else.There is no
> excuse for such behavior:
>
> postgres=# SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP('20:-16-06:13: 15_43:!36',
> 'YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS');
> to_timestamp
> ------------------------------
> 0018-08-05 13:15:43+02:30:17
> (1 row)
>
>
> T
> o be honest I don't see how this is relevant to quoted content. And
> you've already made this point quite clearly - repeating it isn't
> constructive. This behavior has existed for a long time and I don't
> see that changing it is a worthwhile endeavor. I believe a new
> function is required that has saner behavior. Otherwise given good
> input and a well-formed parse string the function does exactly what it
> is designed to do. Avoid giving it garbage and you will be fine.
> Maybe wrap the call to the in a function that also checks for the
> expected layout and RAISE EXCEPTION if it doesn't match.
>
> David J.
>
>
Arguing just like that one can say that we don't even need exception
like "division by zero". Just use well-formed numbers in denominator...
Input data sometimes can be generated automagically. Without exception
throwing debugging stored function containing to_timestamp can be painful.