Re: Statement-level rollback

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Statement-level rollback
Date: 2017-08-14 22:58:18
Message-ID: d4513040-d46c-0b10-69b3-2e2f3fa434f2@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 2/28/17 02:39, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> The code for stored functions is not written yet, but I'd like your feedback for the specification and design based on the current patch. I'll add this patch to CommitFest 2017-3.

This patch needs to be rebased for the upcoming commit fest.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-14 23:00:43 Re: postgres_fdw: evaluate placeholdervars on remote server
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-14 22:54:38 Re: make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-08-21 12:51:24 Re: [JDBC] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2017-08-14 17:42:04 Re: Should we still put the driver in CATALINA_HOME/lib and not in the application's war?