From: | Fabio Pardi <f(dot)pardi(at)portavita(dot)eu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | PostgreSQL VS MongoDB: a use case comparison |
Date: | 2018-11-19 15:38:27 |
Message-ID: | d43fd220-09f7-af4c-2623-44f094b15115@portavita.eu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi list,
For your consideration I'm submitting you a research I made together with my colleague Wouter.
We compared the 2 databases for our specific use case on medical data stored using FHIR standard.
This is indeed a very restrictive use case, and moreover under read only circumstances. We are aware of that.
We might consider in a near future to enlarge the scope of the research including read and write operations, more use cases, using partitioning, and/or scaling Mongo.
This has to be considered as a starting point and we would like to share our results aiming in constructive feedbacks and perhaps fix mistakes or inaccuracies you might find.
This is the link:
We are open to any kind of feedback and we hope you enjoy the reading.
Regards,
Fabio Pardi and Wouter van Teijlingen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-11-19 17:26:09 | Re: PostgreSQL VS MongoDB: a use case comparison |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2018-11-17 19:28:10 | Re: checkpoint occurs very often when vacuum full running |