| From: | Fabio Pardi <f(dot)pardi(at)portavita(dot)eu> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | PostgreSQL VS MongoDB: a use case comparison |
| Date: | 2018-11-19 15:38:27 |
| Message-ID: | d43fd220-09f7-af4c-2623-44f094b15115@portavita.eu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi list,
For your consideration I'm submitting you a research I made together with my colleague Wouter.
We compared the 2 databases for our specific use case on medical data stored using FHIR standard.
This is indeed a very restrictive use case, and moreover under read only circumstances. We are aware of that.
We might consider in a near future to enlarge the scope of the research including read and write operations, more use cases, using partitioning, and/or scaling Mongo.
This has to be considered as a starting point and we would like to share our results aiming in constructive feedbacks and perhaps fix mistakes or inaccuracies you might find.
This is the link:
We are open to any kind of feedback and we hope you enjoy the reading.
Regards,
Fabio Pardi and Wouter van Teijlingen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-11-19 17:26:09 | Re: PostgreSQL VS MongoDB: a use case comparison |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2018-11-17 19:28:10 | Re: checkpoint occurs very often when vacuum full running |