Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process
Date: 2020-02-28 09:02:40
Message-ID: d41527ae-717b-2123-5d5c-fa973f157447@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I have set this patch to "returned with feedback" in the upcoming commit
fest, because I will not be able to finish it.

Unsurprisingly, the sequencing of startup actions in postmaster.c is
extremely tricky and needs more thinking. All the rest worked pretty
well, I thought.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Juan José Santamaría Flecha 2020-02-28 09:15:45 Re: BUG #15858: could not stat file - over 4GB
Previous Message John Naylor 2020-02-28 08:42:34 Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals