From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Sergey Shinderuk <s(dot)shinderuk(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com, er(at)xs4all(dot)nl, joel(at)compiler(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 |
Date: | 2024-06-02 21:31:03 |
Message-ID: | d3edc4a4-94ff-4c00-ad81-4ff0c9d7f0be@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25.05.24 12:50, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> It looks odd - It is not intuitive, it introduces new inconsistency
> inside Postgres, or with solutions in other databases. No other database
> has a similar rule, so users coming from Oracle, Db2, or MSSQL, Firebird
> will be confused. Users that use PL/pgSQL will be confused.
Do you have a description of what those other systems do? Maybe you
posted it already earlier?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-06-02 22:15:48 | Re: pltcl crashes due to a syntax error |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-06-02 21:22:07 | Re: Switch background worker on/off in runtime. |