From: | NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Trevor Hardcastle" <chizu(at)spicious(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support |
Date: | 2007-05-02 11:39:16 |
Message-ID: | d3c4af540705020439l68c99a8fya22b30959fb196d9@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hi Neil,
>
> * the patch is broken for expressional indexes, and silently omits
> copying the predicate that may be associated with an index. It also
> doesn't copy the index's amoptions (WITH clause), or the NULLS
> FIRST/etc. options that may be associated with any of the index's
> columns.
Since this patch is only supposed to copy unique/primary indexes, I dont
think we will ever have predicates associated to such indexes?
Regards,
Nikhils
--
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-05-02 11:50:14 | Re: Patch queue triage |
Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2007-05-02 11:31:31 | Re: Heap page diagnostic functions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-05-02 12:51:53 | Re: [GENERAL] dropping role w/dependent objects |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-02 11:05:39 | Re: non-recursive WITH clause support |