| From: | Scott Mead <scott(dot)lists(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication |
| Date: | 2009-06-24 03:00:40 |
| Message-ID: | d3ab2ec80906232000q28b67348w49347cd901c1953@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Craig Ringer
<craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>wrote:
> Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> > Mike Christensen wrote on 23.06.2009 19:37:
> >> Does anyone actually have that (any node can go down and the others
> still
> >> replicate amongst themselves?)
> >
> > I think this is what Oracle promises with their RAC technology.
>
> Isn't RAC a shared-storage cluster?
Shared-
Storage
Memory
Listener
Storage : Obvious
Memory: Cache fusion maintains buffer consistency across the network
Listener: Load balancing and failover of connections are handled
transparently by TNS (transparent network substrate).
--Scott
>
>
> --
> Craig Ringer
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Alan Brewer | 2009-06-24 03:16:49 | PgDay Athens 2009: Call for Presentations |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2009-06-24 02:13:53 | Re: Separating raise notice lines |