| From: | "Otto Blomqvist" <o(dot)blomqvist(at)secomintl(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Problems with Set Returning Functions (SRFs) |
| Date: | 2005-04-06 22:31:45 |
| Message-ID: | d31o0l$slu$1@news.hub.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
Ofcourse this works perfectly !
Thanks a lot Tom !
Just curious, is this (x)-"trick" in the postgres manual somewhere ? Just
just common SQL guru knowledge ? ;)
/Otto Blomqvist
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in message
news:5852(dot)1112819444(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us(dot)(dot)(dot)
> "Otto Blomqvist" <o(dot)blomqvist(at)secomintl(dot)com> writes:
> > secom=# select f1, f2, f3 from testpassbyval(1, (Select number1 from
test));
> > ERROR: more than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression
>
> In 8.0 I think it'd work to do
>
> select (x).f1, (x).f2, (x).f3 from
> (select testpassbyval(1, number1) as x from test) ss;
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Parker | 2005-04-06 22:37:33 | Re: monitoring database activity on solaris |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-06 22:27:01 | Re: Big trouble with memory !! |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | TJ O'Donnell | 2005-04-07 03:48:23 | 9.17.5. Row-wise Comparison |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-06 20:30:44 | Re: Problems with Set Returning Functions (SRFs) |