From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | A Z <poweruserm(at)live(dot)com(dot)au>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Question about attention to pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org |
Date: | 2022-06-26 11:22:49 |
Message-ID: | d289151aa48742eaec2041ee4d9ab47e81e5428e.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 2022-06-26 at 10:37 +0000, A Z wrote:
> I have successfully sent an (updated) email list message to
>
> pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
>
> which can be viewed in the archive here:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Rm7WBtZZpYL1NWuunuN_16EY0JcyejqV22z_JlUfvD5FYPenGDd_ZGUddwAcMNi2KNSyvqAhBRzj2JxtJoNmWAzykBQU4Z1AzBp0GPs8wZQ=@protonmail.com
>
> I was wondering if anyone can or will pay some active attention to it?
> i.e. what can I do from here to raise the message there to the attention
> of more people involved with pgsql-hackers, in order to get one or more
> active email replies in response to what I have posed/asked?
It is a long, winding e-mail, suggesting an extension for "high precision arithmetic support".
It is written in a way so that at least I cannot right away understand what this is supposed
to be, or how it does anything that "numeric" doesn't.
At the end of your e-mail, it turns out that you are looking for someone to implement this
not very well specified extension for you, for free.
I am not surprised that you got no response. You'll have to write that extension yourself
or hire someone to do it for you (but then you should come up with a better specification).
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-06-26 13:15:39 | Re: Question about attention to pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org |
Previous Message | A Z | 2022-06-26 10:37:18 | Question about attention to pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org |