Re: Function to promote standby servers

From: Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Function to promote standby servers
Date: 2018-11-28 01:06:34
Message-ID: d237cfe0-f983-1195-be0b-31aba0cc398f@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/19/2018 01:22 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 01:51:24PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Or we could use "the function returns true immediately after initiating
>> the promotion by sending the promotion signal to the postmaster"? As a
>> native speaker which one feels more natural to you?
>
> Sorry for the time it took. After pondering on it, I have committed the
> improvements from your version.

Thanks, looks good (and apologies for the delay in responding from my
side).

Regards

Ian Barwick

--
Ian Barwick http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-28 01:11:30 Re: Function to promote standby servers
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-11-28 01:04:18 Re: logical decoding vs. VACUUM FULL / CLUSTER on table with TOAST-ed data