From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "asaba(dot)takanori(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <asaba(dot)takanori(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anthony Nowocien <anowocien(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Conflict handling for COPY FROM |
Date: | 2020-04-08 15:16:57 |
Message-ID: | d2222495-a7da-d81a-9058-9f5cea6d763d@pgmasters.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 3:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>> wrote:
>
> I took a quick look at this patch, since it was marked "ready for
> committer", but I don't see how it can possibly be considered
> committable.
Based on Tom's review I've marked this patch Returned with Feedback.
If there's an acceptable implementation, it seems that it would be very
different from what we have here.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-04-08 15:24:12 | DETACH PARTITION and FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables |
Previous Message | James Coleman | 2020-04-08 15:13:26 | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) |