Re: Conflict handling for COPY FROM

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "asaba(dot)takanori(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <asaba(dot)takanori(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anthony Nowocien <anowocien(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Conflict handling for COPY FROM
Date: 2020-04-08 15:16:57
Message-ID: d2222495-a7da-d81a-9058-9f5cea6d763d@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 3:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>> wrote:
>
> I took a quick look at this patch, since it was marked "ready for
> committer", but I don't see how it can possibly be considered
> committable.

Based on Tom's review I've marked this patch Returned with Feedback.

If there's an acceptable implementation, it seems that it would be very
different from what we have here.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-04-08 15:24:12 DETACH PARTITION and FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables
Previous Message James Coleman 2020-04-08 15:13:26 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)