From: | "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
Date: | 2010-04-26 15:01:41 |
Message-ID: | d1edfc5f47b094247325a14d08bc60a0.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, April 26, 2010 08:52, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>> FWIW, here are some more results from pgbench comparing
>> primary and standby (both with Simon's patch).
>
> Was there a difference in CPU utilization between the primary
> and standby?
>
I haven't monitored it..
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2010-04-26 15:04:09 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-04-26 14:46:35 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct |