Re: SSL test names

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSL test names
Date: 2018-02-08 16:18:19
Message-ID: d1e2697f-bd47-6292-b096-a48eb7e5b6a5@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/7/18 23:18, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You need to update the comment on top of test_connect_ok in
> ServerSetup.pm.

done and committed

> Wouldn't it be better to use the expected result
> as an argument and merge test_connect_ok and test_connect_fails?

That doesn't seem to be the general style, and I think it's more
readable the way it is now.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2018-02-08 17:04:44 Re: New gist vacuum.
Previous Message Markus Nullmeier 2018-02-08 16:17:07 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: generic WAL compression