| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++ |
| Date: | 2017-12-20 15:20:08 |
| Message-ID: | d17aa40f-8255-a822-367b-da14e684eed8@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/20/17 00:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> I do not have a well-informed opinion on whether
>
> #if defined(__cpp_static_assert) && __cpp_static_assert >= 200410
>
> is an appropriate test for static_assert() being available, but I'm
> pretty suspicious of it because none of my C++ compilers seem to
> take that path, not even recent stuff like clang 9.0.0.
For clang, you apparently need to pass -std=c++11 or higher. With g++
>=6, that's the default.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-12-20 15:23:53 | Re: [HACKERS] replace GrantObjectType with ObjectType |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-12-20 15:08:26 | Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures |