| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Additional Chapter for Tutorial |
| Date: | 2021-05-21 08:52:42 |
| Message-ID: | d145fcd1d37f3a4d1b9a75d4203ec63f1d58cd25.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2021-05-21 at 08:47 +0200, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> Peter changed the status to 'Returned with feedback' at the end of the
> last commit fest. I'm not absolutely sure, but my understanding is that
> the patch is rejected.
There is a different status for that.
"Returned with feedback" means: there was review, and further work by
the author is needed, or we need more discussion if we want that or not
or how it should be, but there hasn't been a lot of feedback from the author
lately, so it seems that just moving it on to the next commitfest is not
the right thing to do.
You are welcome to re-submit the patch if you address the feedback.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2021-05-21 10:22:14 | ALTER COLLATION ... REFRESH VERSION - sample script outdated |
| Previous Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2021-05-21 06:47:15 | Re: Additional Chapter for Tutorial |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2021-05-21 09:00:00 | Re: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot |
| Previous Message | Masahiro Ikeda | 2021-05-21 08:48:08 | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |