From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues for foreign tables |
Date: | 2017-06-30 09:44:02 |
Message-ID: | d0a12e42-e20a-b561-76ed-7fa48d4b520a@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/06/16 21:29, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On 2017/06/16 19:26, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> That issue has not been addressed. The reason stated was that it would
>> make code complicated. But I have not had chance to look at how
>> complicated would be and assess myself whether that's worth the
>> trouble.
> I have to admit that what I proposed upthread is a quick-and-dirty
> kluge. One thing I thought to address your concern was to move
> rewriteTargetListUD entirely from the rewriter to the planner when doing
> inherited UPDATE/DELETE, but I'm not sure that's a good idea, because at
> least I think that would need a lot more changes to the rewriter.
I'll have second thought about this, so I'll mark this as waiting on author.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo Nagata | 2017-06-30 10:01:20 | Fix doc of DROP SUBSCRIPTION |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-06-30 09:41:53 | Re: Apparent walsender bug triggered by logical replication |