From: | Herwig Goemans <herwig(dot)goemans(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16976: server crash when deleting via a trigger on a foreign table |
Date: | 2021-04-28 12:24:38 |
Message-ID: | d01e4f40-43e6-310a-6f07-d36096ea564d@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Support,
The problem is in ifx_fdw.c but I do not have dbg packages installed
for this nor do I know where to find these for ubuntu.
But is there no way you can simulate this issue ? There is a PG server
crash due to bad user code in a trigger function.
In the mean time we found out that the user code in the trigger function
was wrong: it has to work with old instead of new values:
delete from informix.t_water_eenheid
where enh_id = old.enh_id;
return old;
instead of:
delete from informix.t_water_eenheid
where enh_id = new.enh_id;
return new;
using old it works fine.
But regardless, the PG server should not crash due to bad user code. I
suppose you agree.
I only work 2 days a week for this client and this is taking up much of
my time so I was hoping you could simulate this.
Kind regards,
Herwig
On 23/04/2021 00:45, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:09 PM Herwig Goemans
> <herwig(dot)goemans(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> And I cannot execute anything in the attached (psql) process,
> A couple of notes about the attach-then-crash approach: It should be
> "postgres", not "psql", that you attach to, and then you need to type
> "cont" to tell the debugger to allow execution to continue, or it'll
> just block as you described. Sometimes it will stop execution when
> signals arrive, and you can disable that with eg "handle SIGUSR1
> nostop" and then go back to executing with "cont" again. Once you
> make it crash, you'll be able to use "bt" to see exactly where, but as
> mentioned it'll just be a bunch of big hex numbers unless the symbols
> are installed; at the least it'll show which modules (postgres,
> informix_fdw.so or such).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-04-28 13:43:58 | Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch |
Previous Message | Kieran McCusker | 2021-04-28 10:52:47 | ogr_fdw missing from /pub/repos/yum/13/fedora/fedora-34-x86_64/ |