From: | "Thomas Wegner" <tomaten(at)t-online(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Speed in V8.0 |
Date: | 2004-12-25 13:28:41 |
Message-ID: | cqjpu7$2r7a$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Thats was it. Now the speed was ok. Thank you.
---------------------------------------------
Thomas Wegner
CabrioMeter - The Weather Plugin for Trillian
http://www.wegner24.de/cabriometer
"Ragnar "Hafsta"" <gnari(at)simnet(dot)is> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1103903110(dot)4447(dot)8(dot)camel(at)localhost(dot)localdomain(dot)(dot)(dot)
> On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 00:03 +0100, Thomas Wegner wrote:
>> Hello, i have a problem between V7.4.3 Cygwin and
>> V8.0RC2 W2K. I have 2 systems:
>>
>> 1. Production Machine
>> - Dual P4 3000MHz
>> - 2 GB RAM
>> - W2K
>> - PostgreSQL 7.4.3 under Cygwin
>> - i connect to it over a DSL Line
>> 2. Develop Machine
>> - P4 1800MHz
>> - 760 MB RAM
>> - PostgreSQL Native Windows
>> - local connection 100MB/FD
>>
>> Both systems use the default postgresql.conf. Now the problem.
>> I have an (unoptimized, dynamic) query wich was execute on the
>> production machine over DSL in 2 seconds and on my develop
>> machine, connected over local LAN, in 119 seconds!
>
> has the development database been ANALYZED ?
>
> gnari
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karl Vogel | 2004-12-26 12:30:15 | Re: Why so much time difference with a same query/plan? |
Previous Message | Thomas Wegner | 2004-12-25 10:21:39 | Re: Speed in V8.0 |