From: | "Thomas Wegner" <tomaten(at)t-online(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Speed in V8.0 |
Date: | 2004-12-22 00:25:45 |
Message-ID: | cqaeu6$1pah$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
2. Develop Machine
- P4 1800MHz
- 760 MB RAM
- W2K
- PostgreSQL 8.0 RC2 Native Windows
- local connection 100MB/FD
---------------------------------------------
Thomas Wegner
CabrioMeter - The Weather Plugin for Trillian
http://www.wegner24.de/cabriometer
"Thomas Wegner" <tomaten(at)t-online(dot)de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:cqaa3l$12im$2(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org(dot)(dot)(dot)
> Hello, i have a problem between V7.4.3 Cygwin and
> V8.0RC2 W2K. I have 2 systems:
>
> 1. Production Machine
> - Dual P4 3000MHz
> - 2 GB RAM
> - W2K
> - PostgreSQL 7.4.3 under Cygwin
> - i connect to it over a DSL Line
> 2. Develop Machine
> - P4 1800MHz
> - 760 MB RAM
> - PostgreSQL Native Windows
> - local connection 100MB/FD
>
> Both systems use the default postgresql.conf. Now the problem.
> I have an (unoptimized, dynamic) query wich was execute on the
> production machine over DSL in 2 seconds and on my develop
> machine, connected over local LAN, in 119 seconds!
>
> Whats this? I can not post the query details here public, its a commercial
> project. Any first idea? I execute on both machine the same query with
> the same database design!
> ---------------------------------------------
> Thomas Wegner
> CabrioMeter - The Weather Plugin for Trillian
> http://www.wegner24.de/cabriometer
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stacy White | 2004-12-22 01:41:39 | Re: Partitioned table performance |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2004-12-21 23:11:55 | Re: Partitioned table performance |