Re: TableSpace Design issues on Postgres 8.0 beta 5

From: "Rosny" <sehatrosny(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TableSpace Design issues on Postgres 8.0 beta 5
Date: 2004-12-07 07:58:06
Message-ID: cp3nqc$27fl$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Thanks for the response.

I just start to get a feel of where TableSpace will be used. You are right I
do not have 7000 logical filesystems.
I am assuming using TableSpace as organization of files in folders in
Windows 2003 Environment. So, each
TableSpace will represent one folder(directory) in a drive. But this doesnot
work to well for my design.

Since pgAdmin III GUI take 2 hours just to load approximately 14000 tables.
I am not using TableSpace approach anymore. I am using multiple database
approach.

Anyway, thanks for the response. Today testing by taking several option to
the limit. I kind of having some ideas
for future scability.

Rosny

"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote in message
news:10164(dot)1102394676(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us(dot)(dot)(dot)
> "Rosny" <sehatrosny(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> > B. For each department create tablespace. (Which means, if there
> > are 7000 departments, there will be 7000 tablespace each contains
> > 20 tables).
>
> If your system has seven thousand separate logical filesystems attached
> to it, there might be some value in having seven thousand tablespaces.
> But I will bet a great deal that it does not and there isn't.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2004-12-07 08:03:08 Re: Config review
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-12-07 05:03:56 Re: Config Check