From: | Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reducing memory usage of insert into select operations? |
Date: | 2008-07-18 04:18:47 |
Message-ID: | cone.1216354727.491297.29970.1000@zoraida.natserv.net |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Douglas McNaught writes:
> It does seem that reducing work_mem might help you, but others on this
I reduced it from 256MB to 64MB. It seems it is helping.
At 256MB the usage per DB connection instance was upwards of 12GB. At 64MB
so far is around 7GB. I just reduced it further to 32MB and see how that
works.
> It would probably be helpful for you to post the EXPLAIN output from
Hash Join (cost=712213.57..27293913.33 rows=234402352 width=24)
Hash Cond: (coh.id = ids.id)
-> Hash Join (cost=551387.26..18799378.16 rows=234402352 width=22)
Hash Cond: (coh.user_id = ca.user_id)
-> Seq Scan on customer_original_historical coh
(cost=0.00..6702501.40 rows=234402352 width=47)
Filter: (yearmo > '200703'::bpchar)
-> Hash (cost=268355.67..268355.67 rows=14637567 width=32)
-> Seq Scan on cards ca
(cost=0.00..268355.67 rows=14637567 width=32)
-> Hash (cost=77883.25..77883.25 rows=5055525 width=6)
-> Seq Scan on customer_ids ids
(cost=0.00..77883.25 rows=5055525 width=6)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | el dorado | 2008-07-18 07:17:51 | C-procedure crashed in Postgres 8.3.3 when using 'text' variable (WinXP) - additional |
Previous Message | Douglas McNaught | 2008-07-18 03:38:28 | Re: Reducing memory usage of insert into select operations? |