From: | William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results |
Date: | 2004-11-15 07:51:19 |
Message-ID: | cn9n5k$chf$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Greg Stark wrote:
> William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>Biggest speedup I've found yet is the backup process (PG_DUMP --> GZIP). 100%
>>faster in 64-bit mode. This drastic speed might be more the result of 64-bit
>>GZIP though as I've seen benchmarks in the past showing encryption/compression
>>running 2 or 3 times faster in 64-bit mode versus 32-bit.
>
>
> Isn't this a major kernel bump too? So a different scheduler, different IO
> scheduler, etc?
>
I'm sure there's some speedup due to the kernel bump. I really didn't
have the patience to even burn the FC2 32-bit CDs much less install both
32-bit & 64-bit FC2 in order to have a more accurate baseline comparison.
However, that being said -- when you see huge speed increases like 50%
100% for dump+gzip, it's doubtful the kernel/process scheduler/IO
scheduler could have made that drastic of a difference. Maybe somebody
else who has done a 2.4 -> 2.6 upgrade can give us a baseline to
subtract from my numbers.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Hammond | 2004-11-15 15:22:59 | Re: Large Database Performance suggestions |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-11-15 07:03:58 | Re: Some quick Opteron 32-bit/64-bit results |