Re: I'm about to release the next postgresql RFD.

From: "Sim Zacks" <sim(at)nospam(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: I'm about to release the next postgresql RFD.
Date: 2004-11-14 15:14:03
Message-ID: cn7sqf$2pha$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

That would be the perfect solution for us, but apparantly not for the rest
of the world.
Since they are offering us 4 and saying we can apply for the other 16 in 6
months, I would take that and not try to take an all or nothing attitude.
More of a work with the newsgroup people then against them attitude.

Personally, I will be very happy if we get approved. I switched to the
newsgroup from the maillist as soon as I found out about it, and my news
server doesn't carry this list so I have to access it through
news.postgresql.org

""Gary L. Burnore"" <gburnore(at)databasix(dot)com> wrote in message
news:6(dot)1(dot)1(dot)1(dot)2(dot)20041114090455(dot)03a5d380(at)popd(dot)databasix(dot)com(dot)(dot)(dot)
> At 01:54 AM 11/14/2004, Sim Zacks wrote:
> >BTW, in Outlook Express if you are posting to the news.postgresql.org
server
> >it will not send a message to news.groups. So this message will not get
> >there unless someone puts it there.
> >
> >If 4 are official and 16 are unofficial, why would that bother you?
>
> Because the groups already exist on many servers. Make them all legit and
> gate them all. Problem solved.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Cox 2004-11-14 16:04:29 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2004-11-14 14:35:55 Re: shrinking physical space used