From: | "Sim Zacks" <sim(at)nospam(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: I'm about to release the next postgresql RFD. |
Date: | 2004-11-14 15:14:03 |
Message-ID: | cn7sqf$2pha$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
That would be the perfect solution for us, but apparantly not for the rest
of the world.
Since they are offering us 4 and saying we can apply for the other 16 in 6
months, I would take that and not try to take an all or nothing attitude.
More of a work with the newsgroup people then against them attitude.
Personally, I will be very happy if we get approved. I switched to the
newsgroup from the maillist as soon as I found out about it, and my news
server doesn't carry this list so I have to access it through
news.postgresql.org
""Gary L. Burnore"" <gburnore(at)databasix(dot)com> wrote in message
news:6(dot)1(dot)1(dot)1(dot)2(dot)20041114090455(dot)03a5d380(at)popd(dot)databasix(dot)com(dot)(dot)(dot)
> At 01:54 AM 11/14/2004, Sim Zacks wrote:
> >BTW, in Outlook Express if you are posting to the news.postgresql.org
server
> >it will not send a message to news.groups. So this message will not get
> >there unless someone puts it there.
> >
> >If 4 are official and 16 are unofficial, why would that bother you?
>
> Because the groups already exist on many servers. Make them all legit and
> gate them all. Problem solved.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Cox | 2004-11-14 16:04:29 | XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2004-11-14 14:35:55 | Re: shrinking physical space used |