From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: About System Catalogs |
Date: | 2004-10-23 09:01:34 |
Message-ID: | cld6lk$s5p$1@floppy.pyrenet.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thomas Swan wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Francesco(dot)Borgoglio(at)cedacri(dot)it writes:
>>
>>
>>>2) As i had a very large pg_largeogject, i deleted rows e now i have a
>>>clean, small table.
>>> The table is empty but its index pg_largeogject_loid_pn_index lasts
>>>to retain a lot of bytes.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>REINDEX should fix this.
>>
>>
>>
> Is REINDEX still going to be a necessity in the 8.0 release? I
> remembered at there was a discussion on the mailing list about a fix or
> need to fix VACUUM so that manually reindexing would not be necessary...
>
This is already true for the 7.4, I don't remember that vacuum was improved
int that direction in the 8.0.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | aditya s | 2004-10-25 02:21:26 | pgsql replicator |
Previous Message | Thomas Swan | 2004-10-23 02:50:43 | Re: About System Catalogs |