Re: beta1 & beta2 & Windows & heavy load

From: Daniel Schuchardt <daniel_schuchardt(at)web(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: beta1 & beta2 & Windows & heavy load
Date: 2004-09-14 09:02:18
Message-ID: ci6c25$1tu8$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane schrieb:
>
> Had you been running the server for very long before forcing the error,
> I don't think this would have happened, because the buffer hashtable
> would have already expanded to its full working size.

Yes, you are right - this was a fresh started pgserver.

>
> Once we fix subxacts to not hold their XID locks after
> subcommit, the probability of a problem should go back down to the same
> low value that's allowed us to ignore this risk for the past many years.
>

I think so, too.

Daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2004-09-14 09:39:32 Rollback on Error
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2004-09-14 08:59:57 Re: Why are there client-only encodings?