From: | William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Table UPDATE is too slow |
Date: | 2004-08-31 19:15:22 |
Message-ID: | ch2j5l$uap$1@news.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Ron St-Pierre wrote:
> Yes, I know that it's not a very good idea, however queries are allowed
> against all of those columns. One option is to disable some or all of the
> indexes when we update, run the update, and recreate the indexes,
> however it may slow down user queries. Because there are so many indexes,
> it is time consuming to recreate them after the update.
Just because a query can run against any column does not mean all
columns should be indexed. Take a good look at the column types and
their value distribution.
Let's say I have a table of addresses but every address I collect is in
the 94116 zip code. That would mean indexes on city, state and zip are
not only useless but could decrease performance.
Also, if a search always includes a unique key (or a column with highly
unique values), eliminating the other indexes would force the planner to
always use that index first.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jerry LeVan | 2004-08-31 19:23:10 | Re: Types and SRF's |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-31 19:14:52 | Re: Types and SRF's |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-08-31 19:15:40 | Re: Optimizing a request |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2004-08-31 19:00:14 | Re: odbc/ado problems |