| From: | Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL suitable? |
| Date: | 2017-12-19 15:48:10 |
| Message-ID: | cff943da-1ed4-4002-ea01-7cf20edec4d2@a-kretschmer.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Am 19.12.2017 um 15:58 schrieb Vincenzo Romano:
> But accordingly to a discussion with Bruce Momjan, table partitionin
> V10 is little more than syntactic sugar around old-fashioned table
> partitioning.
there is always room for improvements, but table-partitioning in pg10 is
much, much better then before.
(there was a impressive talk about that:
https://www.postgresql.eu/events/schedule/pgconfeu2017/session/1643-everything-wrong-with-partitioning-in-postgresql-10/
)
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Melvin Davidson | 2017-12-19 15:51:40 | Re: Re: PostgreSQL needs percentage function |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-12-19 15:48:01 | Re: PostgreSQL suitable? |